Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2002 20:54:27 -0600 (CST) From: Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com> To: Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@linux.realnet.co.sz> Cc: John Regehr <regehr@cs.utah.edu>, Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>, <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Linuxthreads on Linux vs FreeBSD performance question Message-ID: <20020404205255.W63621-100000@patrocles.silby.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0204040847430.10620-100000@netfinity.realnet.co.sz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 4 Apr 2002, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote: > On Wed, 3 Apr 2002, John Regehr wrote: > > There does not appear to be a statistically significant difference > > between a native binary and an emulated Linux binary. > > Wouldn't the only place you'd notice slight overhead be syscalls? > > Zwane > > -- > http://function.linuxpower.ca In theory, that should be the case. However, he's probably using a different compiler, and glibc might act differently than libc. Since he's trying to draw conclusions, it was certainly worth checking to see if there was a difference between native & emulation. Mike "Silby" Silbersack To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020404205255.W63621-100000>