Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 4 Apr 2002 20:54:27 -0600 (CST)
From:      Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com>
To:        Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@linux.realnet.co.sz>
Cc:        John Regehr <regehr@cs.utah.edu>, Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>, <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: Linuxthreads on Linux vs FreeBSD performance question
Message-ID:  <20020404205255.W63621-100000@patrocles.silby.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0204040847430.10620-100000@netfinity.realnet.co.sz>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Thu, 4 Apr 2002, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote:

> On Wed, 3 Apr 2002, John Regehr wrote:
> > There does not appear to be a statistically significant difference
> > between a native binary and an emulated Linux binary.
>
> Wouldn't the only place you'd notice slight overhead be syscalls?
>
> 	Zwane
>
> --
> http://function.linuxpower.ca

In theory, that should be the case.  However, he's probably using a
different compiler, and glibc might act differently than libc.  Since
he's trying to draw conclusions, it was certainly worth checking to see if
there was a difference between native & emulation.

Mike "Silby" Silbersack


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020404205255.W63621-100000>