From owner-freebsd-arch@freebsd.org  Sun Nov 26 14:29:17 2017
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29223DE7621;
 Sun, 26 Nov 2017 14:29:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com)
Received: from land.berklix.org (land.berklix.org [144.76.10.75])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "land.berklix.org", Issuer "land.berklix.org" (not verified))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5FDE6C468;
 Sun, 26 Nov 2017 14:29:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com)
Received: from mart.js.berklix.net (pD9FA9D37.dip0.t-ipconnect.de
 [217.250.157.55]) (authenticated bits=0)
 by land.berklix.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id vAQES2q3087856
 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
 Sun, 26 Nov 2017 14:28:07 GMT (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com)
Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41])
 by mart.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id vAQET3Xv080874;
 Sun, 26 Nov 2017 15:29:03 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com)
Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id vAQDmCqn000352;
 Sun, 26 Nov 2017 14:50:05 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com)
Message-Id: <201711261350.vAQDmCqn000352@fire.js.berklix.net>
To: "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>,
 "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: The future of fortune(6)
From: "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@berklix.com>
Organization: http://berklix.eu BSD Unix Linux Consultants, Munich Germany
User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://berklix.eu/free/
X-From: http://www.berklix.eu/~jhs/
In-reply-to: Your message "Sat, 25 Nov 2017 10:28:14 -0600."
 <20171125162814.GA9954@lonesome.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2017 14:48:12 +0100
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture <freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-arch>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2017 14:29:17 -0000

Hi Hackers@ & Arch@
Mcl's long held animosity to me distracts.  Better to consider ideas
not by author, but on merit or otherwise, & maybe improve them.

> Commit bits are a privilege.  Contentious commits forced through
> before discussion, should by policy be automaticaly reverted,
> & committers bit suspended, pending committer peer review - Not with
> reference to the desirability or otherwise of a commit, but for
> imposing on FreeBSD without prior discussion.
> 
> Commiter conduct reviews should be seperate from 
> discussion of desirability of a contentious commit.

Cheers,
Julian
-- 
Julian H. Stacey, Computer Consultant, BSD Linux Unix Systems Engineer, Munich
 Reply below, Prefix '> '. Plain text, No .doc, base64, HTML, quoted-printable.
 http://berklix.eu/brexit/ UK stole 3,500,000 votes; 700,000 from Brits in EU.