From owner-freebsd-security Mon May 15 14: 0:44 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu [18.24.4.193]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C3E337B81C for ; Mon, 15 May 2000 14:00:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu) Received: (from wollman@localhost) by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id RAA41227; Mon, 15 May 2000 17:00:30 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wollman) Date: Mon, 15 May 2000 17:00:30 -0400 (EDT) From: Garrett Wollman Message-Id: <200005152100.RAA41227@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: Doug Barton Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: New packaging tool (was Re: Applying patches with out a compiler) In-Reply-To: <391E4BCC.6EA3DB59@gorean.org> References: <107101bfbc60$aabeb350$040aa8c0@local.mindstep.com> <391C9CBC.4E0ED8E5@softweyr.com> <200005130137.TAA09188@nomad.yogotech.com> <391E4BCC.6EA3DB59@gorean.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org < said: > I concur. I've always wondered why (info-)zip hasn't enjoyed more > popularity in the unix world. I used it extensively back when I ran > OS/2, and it has a lot of nice features. Because post-archive-compression compresses better, if the contents of the files are similar. Also because people have a 25-year history with `tar', `ar', and similar UNIX programs; the `zip' and `unzip' programs have a non-intuitive command-line syntax, by comparison. -GAWollman To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message