From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 15 06:28:24 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6013716A4D0 for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 06:28:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from gandalf.online.bg (gandalf.online.bg [217.75.128.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DC2BC43D60 for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 06:28:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from roam@ringlet.net) Received: (qmail 22341 invoked from network); 15 Jun 2004 06:26:10 -0000 Received: from office.sbnd.net (HELO straylight.m.ringlet.net) (217.75.140.130) by gandalf.online.bg with SMTP; 15 Jun 2004 06:26:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 34836 invoked by uid 1000); 15 Jun 2004 06:28:01 -0000 Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 09:28:01 +0300 From: Peter Pentchev To: Gary Corcoran Message-ID: <20040615062800.GD987@straylight.m.ringlet.net> Mail-Followup-To: Gary Corcoran , freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org References: <40CDFD39.3090309@comcast.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Y7xTucakfITjPcLV" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <40CDFD39.3090309@comcast.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD or other BSD for no-MMU ARM processor ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 06:28:24 -0000 --Y7xTucakfITjPcLV Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 03:32:09PM -0400, Gary Corcoran wrote: >=20 > Does anyone know if there is a port of FreeBSD, or any of the > other BSDs (e.g. NetBSD) for that matter, which will run on an > ARM processor which does NOT have an MMU (Memory Management Unit)? Your best bet would be http://www.netbsd.org/Ports/ Unfortunately, I'm not too familiar with the ARM line of processors, so it's not really obvious to me if NetBSD supports architecturs without MMU's. ISTR that there was a decision very early down the line for FreeBSD to *not* support anything that didn't have an MMU.. or was that even earlier, and does it also hold true for other BSD's? G'luck, Peter --=20 Peter Pentchev roam@ringlet.net roam@sbnd.net roam@FreeBSD.org PGP key: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc Key fingerprint FDBA FD79 C26F 3C51 C95E DF9E ED18 B68D 1619 4553 If the meanings of 'true' and 'false' were switched, then this sentence wou= ldn't be false. --Y7xTucakfITjPcLV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAzpbw7Ri2jRYZRVMRAq4eAJ9nZYk+GysYYD9m3udjlnlp1ateHwCgrqpg h3nmHxyL9SvyOTlGgbuttk4= =KMxg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Y7xTucakfITjPcLV--