Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 01:36:29 +0200 From: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> To: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Unifying WWW: pkg-descr lines for cpan ports Message-ID: <1126395389.73544.39.camel@ikaros.oook.cz> In-Reply-To: <p06230909bf491bb2a676@[128.113.24.47]> References: <200509102222.j8AMMubj032724@bright.research.att.com> <p06230909bf491bb2a676@[128.113.24.47]>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-GSDvr+Fh8BGTW/g6duJv
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Garance A Drosihn p=ED=B9e v so 10. 09. 2005 v 19:32 -0400:
> At 6:22 PM -0400 9/10/05, Bill Fenner wrote:
> >
> >The disadvantage of this second phase is that if the port is for
> >an older version of the module, that the WWW: URL will point to
> >the most recent version.
>=20
> I am a little uncomfortable with this. If I understand this right,
> this means the "download" step of a port will succeed, only to have
> the "checksum" step fail. I suspect that will be confusing for
> users, and they will then ask about their mysterious file-corruption
> problems on the mailing lists.
>=20
> Or maybe I've just got the wrong idea of what this means...
This is all about changing WWW lines in pkg-descr, right?
No one's touching Makefile or distinfo.
--=20
Pav Lucistnik <pav@oook.cz>
<pav@FreeBSD.org>
--=-GSDvr+Fh8BGTW/g6duJv
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQBDI239ntdYP8FOsoIRAjdIAKCkeoQRa8j/Wuh0HURFZoUxNx4j0QCeKwMl
vkAvs0jxBaOvbSPwlNxCAE0=
=Y3v1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-GSDvr+Fh8BGTW/g6duJv--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1126395389.73544.39.camel>