From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 16 07:37:34 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4416616A417 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2007 07:37:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stefan.lambrev@moneybookers.com) Received: from blah.sun-fish.com (blah.sun-fish.com [217.18.249.150]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2B2513C4A7 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2007 07:37:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stefan.lambrev@moneybookers.com) Received: from blah.sun-fish.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by blah.sun-fish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95E461B10EE8; Thu, 16 Aug 2007 09:37:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hater.cmotd.com (hater.cmotd.com [192.168.3.125]) by blah.sun-fish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 935DB1B10EA4; Thu, 16 Aug 2007 09:37:32 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <46C3FEBC.80409@moneybookers.com> Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 10:37:32 +0300 From: Stefan Lambrev User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4pre (X11/20070711) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eygene Ryabinkin References: <20070806224112.GA21876@muon.bluestop.org> <20070807073920.GV50228@void.codelabs.ru> <46C18B60.8050400@moneybookers.com> <20070814145759.GB25169@void.codelabs.ru> <20070814193150.GA21553@rot26.obsecurity.org> <46C30FA6.7060108@moneybookers.com> <20070815145640.GQ988@void.codelabs.ru> <46C319DD.3010806@moneybookers.com> <20070815172731.GR988@void.codelabs.ru> In-Reply-To: <20070815172731.GR988@void.codelabs.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP on BLAH Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "tcpflags 0x18; tcp_do_segment" kernel messages X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 07:37:34 -0000 Hello, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote: > The previous one: client mb7.intra.net had thrown his 'QUIT' and > closed the socket, thus he is not interested in the server's response. > Judging by the normal end of the task that you're citing below, the > normal client workflow is to wait for the server's response to the > 'quit' message and to close the socket only after it. So something > unusual happening to the client and it is really interesting to > look at the client's sources to see what's up. > > To clarify a bit: are all two servers running -CURRENT, or just the > client one? > > Thank you! > Only mb7 is -current (i386), mb4 is 6.2 (i386). The server is postfix, but the client is binary and we do not have the sources. I'll see what the creators can tell about this. -- Best Wishes, Stefan Lambrev ICQ# 24134177