From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Aug 13 12:32:28 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id MAA22747 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 13 Aug 1997 12:32:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from shadows.aeon.net (bsdhack@shadows.aeon.net [194.100.41.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA22717 for ; Wed, 13 Aug 1997 12:32:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from bsdhack@localhost) by shadows.aeon.net (8.8.7/8.8.3) id WAA00949 for hackers@freebsd.org; Wed, 13 Aug 1997 22:29:57 +0300 (EET DST) From: mika ruohotie Message-Id: <199708131929.WAA00949@shadows.aeon.net> Subject: speed test To: hackers@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 13 Aug 1997 22:29:57 +0300 (EET DST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL31 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk i think someone might be interested in this test i did... i was using black intel pentium 200 classic cpus, 64 megs ram on each machines, 60ns edo and 10ns sdram on tx97-e. speed difference to sdram with 66 was only 1Mbyt/sec. didnt yet have cooling to test the faster 83 bus on the tx. gigabyte has mid july 2.2-stable, other machines today's current with PQ_LARGECACHE and CPU_UPGRADE_HW_CACHE. i used the good old 'dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/null bs=128k count=8000' and 'dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/null bs=1m count=1000' tests... numbers are Mbyt/sec. can anyone beat those tx97-e speeds? 128k 1m mb 66 75 83 66 75 83 ga586hx512 136,0 137,4 p2t4hx512 117,4 137,7 142,4 120,0 130,4 145,3 tx97-e 132,1 149,6l 134,6 151,4 so, gigabyte is the fastest board here, no doubts. too bad it doesnt have faster bus speeds. tx is also faster than hx. tx loves sdram and higher bus speeds. tomorrow i test k6 200... =)) mickey