From owner-freebsd-ports  Wed Mar 29 15: 6: 7 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id B508C37B7F1; Wed, 29 Mar 2000 14:23:20 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from ade@FreeBSD.org)
Received: (from ade@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id OAA62449;
	Wed, 29 Mar 2000 14:23:20 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from ade@FreeBSD.org)
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 14:23:20 -0800 (PST)
From: <ade@FreeBSD.org>
Message-Id: <200003292223.OAA62449@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: naddy@mips.rhein-neckar.de, ade@FreeBSD.org,
	freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: ports/15545: New port: x11/xterm
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

Synopsis: New port: x11/xterm

State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
State-Changed-By: ade
State-Changed-When: Wed Mar 29 14:19:26 PST 2000
State-Changed-Why: 
Has the functionality in this port been rolled into either
XFree86 3.3.6 or one of the pre-4.0 snapshots?

This port worries me in that it overwrites a couple of
standard X11 binaries (xterm and resize), so that a
pkg_delete would result in _no_ xterm being available,
which is a bad thing.

Unless a solution can be found to this problem
(remember to deal with the app-defaults too), I
believe that this submission should just die peacefully.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message