From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sun Jul  9 13:42:02 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id NAA13666
          for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 9 Jul 1995 13:42:02 -0700
Received: from hda.com (hda.com [199.232.40.182])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id NAA13660
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Sun, 9 Jul 1995 13:41:59 -0700
Received: (dufault@localhost) by hda.com (8.6.11/8.3) id QAA16930; Sun, 9 Jul 1995 16:35:10 -0400
From: Peter Dufault <dufault@hda.com>
Message-Id: <199507092035.QAA16930@hda.com>
Subject: Re: new getsid(2) system call for freebsd...
To: julian@ref.tfs.com (Julian Elischer)
Date: Sun, 9 Jul 1995 16:35:09 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de, ukkonen@aphrodite.funet.fi,
        hackers@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <199507091937.MAA10453@ref.tfs.com> from "Julian Elischer" at Jul 9, 95 12:37:40 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 432       
Sender: hackers-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

Julian Elischer writes:

> I notice however that systems that are moving towards posix
> are all implimenting this..
> (osf and solaris to name two)
> I assume therefore (not having POSIX docs) that it might be 
> 1/ common
> 2/ required

getsid() is not POSIX.

-- 
Peter Dufault               Real Time Machine Control and Simulation
HD Associates, Inc.         Voice: 508 433 6936
dufault@hda.com             Fax:   508 433 5267