From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Nov 20 03:34:41 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id DAA29867 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 20 Nov 1997 03:34:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers) Received: from db2server.voga.com.br (db2server.voga.com.br [200.239.39.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id DAA29836 for ; Thu, 20 Nov 1997 03:34:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Daniel_Sobral@voga.com.br) Received: from papagaio.voga.com.br (papagaio.voga.com.br [200.239.39.2]) by db2server.voga.com.br (8.8.3+2.6Wbeta9/8.8.7) with SMTP id IAA13742 for ; Thu, 20 Nov 1997 08:33:32 -0300 Received: by papagaio.voga.com.br(Lotus SMTP MTA v1.06 (346.7 3-18-1997)) id 03256555.003F7B44 ; Thu, 20 Nov 1997 08:33:23 -0300 X-Lotus-FromDomain: VOGA From: "Daniel Sobral" To: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Message-ID: <03256555.003F5208.00@papagaio.voga.com.br> Date: Thu, 20 Nov 1997 08:33:18 -0300 Subject: Re: Virtual Intel Machines? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > Of course, given that Intel chips work the way they do, it sounds > like it'd be pretty much impossible to do what I was hoping for. > Sigh. It was such a cool idea, too. Err, maybe. That depends on _what_ you want. See the FLUX/FLUKE project, for instance. They run virtual machines, but not like the old vm machines. And work over Intel.