From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Jul 27 12:38:38 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) id MAA03640 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 27 Jul 1995 12:38:38 -0700 Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [204.188.121.18]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) with ESMTP id MAA03632 for ; Thu, 27 Jul 1995 12:38:36 -0700 Received: from localhost.v-site.net (localhost.v-site.net [127.0.0.1]) by rah.star-gate.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) with SMTP id MAA13354; Thu, 27 Jul 1995 12:38:32 -0700 Message-Id: <199507271938.MAA13354@rah.star-gate.com> X-Authentication-Warning: rah.star-gate.com: Host localhost.v-site.net didn't use HELO protocol X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95 To: nate@sneezy.sri.com (Nate Williams) cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ld.so: ivs: libcompat.so.2.0: Undefined error: 0 In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 27 Jul 1995 13:31:20 MDT." <199507271931.NAA01546@rocky.sri.MT.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 27 Jul 1995 12:38:31 -0700 From: "Amancio Hasty Jr." Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >>> Nate Williams said: > Amancio Hasty, Jr. writes: > > > The solution is to remove the dependency of libcompat in whatever > > > program requires libcompat and send the changes back to the maintainer. > > > > > > > Does mwm depend on libcompat? > > I don't know. I don't *think* so, but I didn't compile up the sources > of your version of mwm. > > > Nate Yeap, mwm from swim is compiled with libcompat. >Is this the mwm from swim-2.0? I just ran it and it seems to work OK. >If I remove libcompat.so.2.0 then it prints a helpful message telling me >it is missing. Could you run it under gdb and get a backtrace? >-- >Doug Rabson, Microsoft RenderMorphics Ltd. Mail: dfr@render.com Also, I tried to run it with gdb mwm and I didn't get a useful trace. Tnks, Amancio