From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 18 11:26:37 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC6FB473; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 11:26:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nicolas@i.0x5.de) Received: from n.0x5.de (n.0x5.de [217.197.85.144]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4573AF7B; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 11:26:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pc5.i.0x5.de (Postfix, from userid 1003) id 3YnfxL12vTz7ySF; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 12:26:30 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 12:26:30 +0100 From: Nicolas Rachinsky To: Artem Belevich Subject: Re: slowdown of zfs (tx->tx) Message-ID: <20130118112630.GA41074@mid.pc5.i.0x5.de> References: <20130114094010.GA75529@mid.pc5.i.0x5.de> <20130114195148.GA20540@mid.pc5.i.0x5.de> <20130114214652.GA76779@mid.pc5.i.0x5.de> <20130115224556.GA41774@mid.pc5.i.0x5.de> <20130116073759.GA47781@mid.pc5.i.0x5.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Powered-by: FreeBSD X-Homepage: http://www.rachinsky.de X-PGP-Keyid: 887BAE72 X-PGP-Fingerprint: 039E 9433 115F BC5F F88D 4524 5092 45C4 887B AE72 X-PGP-Keys: http://www.rachinsky.de/nicolas/gpg/nicolas_rachinsky.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: freebsd-fs X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 11:26:37 -0000 * Artem Belevich [2013-01-16 00:45 -0800]: > On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 11:37 PM, Nicolas Rachinsky > wrote: > >> You may want to update your system to very recent FreeBSD as quite a > >> few fixes were recently imported from illumos. Hopefully it will deal > >> with the issue. I'm out of ideas otherwise. Sorry. > > > > Do you mean -CURRENT or -STABLE with very recent? Or just 9.1? > > -HEAD or -STABLE (-8 or -9). I have now updated the machine to stable/8 r245541. I have not updated the zpool. But the problem still occurs. Should I update the pool? Or try other things first? Nicolas -- http://www.rachinsky.de/nicolas