From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 24 22:15:13 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECAEE16A41F for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2006 22:15:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sthaug@nethelp.no) Received: from bizet.nethelp.no (bizet.nethelp.no [195.1.209.33]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 964CA43D5F for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2006 22:15:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sthaug@nethelp.no) Received: (qmail 71089 invoked from network); 24 Jan 2006 22:15:04 -0000 Received: from bizet.nethelp.no (HELO localhost) (195.1.209.33) by bizet.nethelp.no with SMTP; 24 Jan 2006 22:15:04 -0000 Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 23:15:04 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <20060124.231504.74682748.sthaug@nethelp.no> To: julian@elischer.org From: sthaug@nethelp.no In-Reply-To: <43D6811D.9070309@elischer.org> References: <20060124075437.B67285@xorpc.icir.org> <43D67C6E.7020403@errno.com> <43D6811D.9070309@elischer.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: current@freebsd.org, rizzo@icir.org Subject: Re: if_flags usage etc. X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 22:15:14 -0000 > We should probably better document the interface "interface". if we are > going to (as Sam suggests) > do some cleanups we might as well consider what other changes should be > put in at the same time. A couple of other suggestions: - For software routers (quagga, zebra etc.) it would be very nice to have "link up" / "link down" notifications to the routing process(es). - One feature sorely missed (which I use a lot in my daily work with hardware based routers) is the ability to associate a "description" field with each interface. Note that this should be available both for physical interfaces (Ethernet etc.) and for logical interfaces (e.g. vlan). Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug@nethelp.no