Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 19:12:29 -0700 From: Jim Mock <jim@osd.bsdi.com> To: Murray Stokely <murray@osd.bsdi.com> Cc: Tass Chapman <tass@kenderhome.com>, Jordan Hubbard <jkh@winston.osd.bsdi.com>, doc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Greetings Message-ID: <20001024191228.A20180@envy.geekhouse.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0010241859390.80847-100000@pike.osd.bsdi.com>; from murray@osd.bsdi.com on Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 07:05:47PM -0700 References: <5.0.0.25.2.20001024132306.033ab910@mail.kenderhome.com> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0010241859390.80847-100000@pike.osd.bsdi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 24 Oct 2000 at 19:05:47 -0700, Murray Stokely wrote: > The number of sections that are marked as "to be written" has > diminished in recent months but a lot of the information is still > hopelessly out of date or poorly written. For example, here is a > quote from the serial communication chapter "This document is written > based on the author's experience with FreeBSD versions 1.0, 1.1, and > 1.1.5.1". Yes, this is definitely a major candidate for updating or nuking completely. I'm not sure enough people even use it to be worth updating. Besides, if it's updated, or nuked, I'll be able to close the PR that Murray opened a while ago pointing out how crufty it is :-) That said, how many of you would object to removing this section completely? We could always add it back later if someone updates it, I'm just starting to think that no info on it is better than 5+ year old info.. - jim -- jim mock <jim@jmock.com> work: jim@osd.bsdi.com | jim@FreeBSD.org http://soupnazi.org/ BSDi Open Source Div | http://bsdi.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001024191228.A20180>