From owner-freebsd-isp Sun Jul 9 3:49:11 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from alpha.root-servers.ch (alpha.root-servers.ch [195.49.62.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5955D37B5D9 for ; Sun, 9 Jul 2000 03:49:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gabriel_ambuehl@buz.ch) Received: (qmail 27885 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2000 10:49:02 -0000 Received: from client99-59.hispeed.ch (62.2.99.59) by ns1.root-servers.ch with SMTP; 9 Jul 2000 10:49:02 -0000 Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2000 12:49:47 +0200 From: Gabriel Ambuehl X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.44) UNREG / CD5BF9353B3B7091 Organization: BUZ Internet Services X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <79242131286.20000709124947@buz.ch> To: Dmitry Koltsov Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re[4]: load balancing In-reply-To: <2600.000709@hostonfly.com> References: <55240464990.20000709122200@buz.ch> <2600.000709@hostonfly.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hello Dmitry, Sunday, July 09, 2000, 12:24:22 PM, you wrote: > it is critical only for server down, balancing work fine ;-) That's exactly what I don't want to have. I need highest reability (because of some special applications) the load balancing stuff is quite optional at the moment and is way easier implemented if the failover of the balancing boxes work reliable... Best regards, Gabriel To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message