Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 16 Jul 2025 17:04:13 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        net@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 227450] [patch] Should not all packets processed by gif_output be deleted, when an running instance of if_gif(4) is member of an instance of if_bridge(4)?
Message-ID:  <bug-227450-7501-BaBrPTVlnt@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-227450-7501@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-227450-7501@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D227450

Koichiro Iwao <meta@FreeBSD.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|FIXED                       |---
                 CC|                            |ae@FreeBSD.org,
                   |                            |meta@FreeBSD.org
             Status|Closed                      |Open

--- Comment #3 from Koichiro Iwao <meta@FreeBSD.org> ---
Hi, I found this broke ethernet over IPv6 when I was testing a fix for bug
280736.

- https://reviews.freebsd.org/D51297

gif_output() may be called due to internal behavior of IPv6 stack when the
outer protocol of the tunnel is IPv6. So the kernel should not panic in such
cases.=20

Proposed fix is here:

- https://reviews.freebsd.org/D51352

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-227450-7501-BaBrPTVlnt>