From owner-cvs-bin Sat Sep 16 18:16:47 1995 Return-Path: owner-cvs-bin Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id SAA11829 for cvs-bin-outgoing; Sat, 16 Sep 1995 18:16:47 -0700 Received: from Root.COM (implode.Root.COM [198.145.90.17]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id SAA11823 ; Sat, 16 Sep 1995 18:16:41 -0700 Received: from corbin.Root.COM (corbin [198.145.90.34]) by Root.COM (8.6.12/8.6.5) with ESMTP id SAA05372; Sat, 16 Sep 1995 18:15:26 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by corbin.Root.COM (8.6.12/8.6.5) with SMTP id SAA00141; Sat, 16 Sep 1995 18:17:47 -0700 Message-Id: <199509170117.SAA00141@corbin.Root.COM> To: "Jonathan M. Bresler" cc: Paul Traina , cvs-bin@freefall.freebsd.org, CVS-commiters@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/bin/rmail rmail.c In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 16 Sep 95 20:53:39 EDT." From: David Greenman Reply-To: davidg@Root.COM Date: Sat, 16 Sep 1995 18:17:46 -0700 Sender: owner-cvs-bin@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >did this go into -stable as well?? No, not yet. It's likely that it won't. >if not, we need a way to introduce, TESTED, modest fixes into -stable as >they become available from now until release. That's what I've been doing for the past 3 months. >the '#define SOMAXCONN 32' in sys/sys/socket.h comes to mind as another >example. That one did go into 2.1. >if this happens already, great! if not ...... The side effects of the rmail patch may not be completely benign. I'd like to see this one tested in some real environments before putting it into 2.1. I don't know if this kind of testing will happen before the 2.1 release (I don't think so). -DG