From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue May 13 15:59:55 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id PAA22584 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 13 May 1997 15:59:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [204.188.121.18]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA22577 for ; Tue, 13 May 1997 15:59:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.star-gate.com [127.0.0.1]) by rah.star-gate.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA29845; Tue, 13 May 1997 15:54:48 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199705132254.PAA29845@rah.star-gate.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.9 8/22/96 To: "Pedro F. Giffuni" cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Is Thot (WYSIWIG editor) for you? In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 13 May 1997 13:01:44 PDT." <3378C8A8.2A54@fps.biblos.unal.edu.co> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 13 May 1997 15:54:48 -0700 From: Amancio Hasty Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Before even on deciding on a separate CDrom distribution , it is more appropriate to decide whether thot is useful or not. On the surface it looks really good , I just have to use thot more extensively over here to determine is goodness. Cheers, Amancio >From The Desk Of "Pedro F. Giffuni" : > Amancio Hasty wrote: > > > > "Pedro F. Giffuni" pointed me out to: > > http://opera.inrialpes.fr/thot/ > > .... > > > > If thot should prove to be useful and stable we can adopt it . > > Hey, if the code bloat bothers you it is well worth it to have a > > separate CDROM with tot and amaya, a web editor / browser. > > We can also include other OO packages such as ACE, ILU and a couple of > > CORBA ORBs 8) > > > It's not that much, besides thot's libraries are shared by Amaya. WC may > also be happy, some people prefer Linux because "it comes with more CDs" > :-). > > Pedro. > > > > Enjoy, > > Amancio > > > > > > > >