From owner-freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org Thu Aug 22 21:09:02 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-toolchain@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1E09D2A0C for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 21:09:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46DxwZ6D3wz3Qmh for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 21:09:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id D5615D2A0B; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 21:09:02 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: toolchain@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D52A2D2A0A for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 21:09:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46DxwZ5LxCz3Qmf for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 21:09:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A2B3A099 for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 21:09:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x7ML92w2035223 for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 21:09:02 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x7ML92Gk035222 for toolchain@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 21:09:02 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: toolchain@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 239266] lang/gcc8 fails to build with clang8: tree-vect-loop.c:4979:12: error: expected unqualified-id Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2019 21:09:02 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: marklmi26-fbsd@yahoo.com X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: toolchain@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Maintenance of FreeBSD's integrated toolchain List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2019 21:09:03 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D239266 --- Comment #23 from Mark Millard --- (In reply to Gerald Pfeifer from comment #11) QUOTE "vec_step is not defined in any of the PowerPC ABIs nor the Altivec PEM/PIM. END QUOTE Were the POWER experts that indicated the above notified of the 1999: https://www.nxp.com/docs/en/reference-manual/ALTIVECPIM.pdf that does define vec_step in "2.5.3 Value for Adjusting Pointers"? (Quoted in comment #13.) At least knowing of it might prompt noticing the type of problem quicker in the future. (I have no idea which POWER experts reported the above quote.) (I'd blaim the document in ALTIVECPIM.pdf as what started this mess by not following langauge naming rules. Then other things that should likely have been done were not done to work around the issue. OpenCL later also having defined vec_step in a similar manor did not help.) --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=