From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 23 15:44:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83CE21065673 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 15:44:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09A3A8FC17 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 15:44:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz12 with SMTP id 12so485922bwz.13 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 07:44:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:reply-to :in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=8LQGvzKgZ0t7TpdbAt6r5GmlDnlRdRrxYlj+tdPLkSY=; b=MKq5eJ7mxHUHc1Q3C7mW9gjkebUZz7aea6yePH3/XQd8+RyJNNiHYwHHx5v+ucfGcL XF9vZNtyZuQY6KnGKbNPs9ZQ4iezgAN5ItWYJg8Dy5tCAZi3Fih2066zPkCiHLWjAPhv xBQ9dZr1363Q1ZHJ1Y2KBKTczZwk/bGKXCMyk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=iGxXqzrtGCxmPEF2Qqr1a17PflaQcnf9PGG6XOWGSEf/UmNqxXKGSWVMj3yg+481nF nz7O41vILiyC963K/gfLW1TKCQMyzZkARTfFGMQ29/TI+3RnBWF0DwXWlJi6D4Y+Q1rn LaY7pE5+1ZaKJgI0WMKMjT5DnApKe0WrEuvW0= Received: by 10.204.70.130 with SMTP id d2mr7243980bkj.166.1293119086703; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 07:44:46 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.52.19 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 07:44:16 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4D135558.4000101@herveybayaustralia.com.au> References: <4D130719.5090203@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4D133600.4010002@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4D135558.4000101@herveybayaustralia.com.au> From: Chris Rees Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 15:44:16 +0000 Message-ID: To: Da Rock Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AMD Athlon64 Mainboard - NOT SPAM: please check it out :) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: utisoft@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 15:44:48 -0000 On 23 December 2010 13:57, Da Rock wrote: > On 12/23/10 23:16, Chris Rees wrote: >> >> On 23 December 2010 11:44, Da Rock >> =A0wrote: >> >> >>> >>> Thanks, but Athlon64 is a 939. Yeah, it may not be worth salvaging, but= I >>> thought the cost might be less... I'm more than likely wrong. Worth >>> putting >>> feelers out, though :) >>> >>> >> >> Athlon64s can be 754, 939 or AM2. Perhaps you meant *your* Athlon64 is a >> 939? >> >> Sorry you're not having much luck. >> >> If I knew the Aussie market I'd help you to pick something comparable, >> but that's better left to someone more local for you! >> >> Hope you get some results soon. >> >> >> > > Well thats from memory, and it is pretty old now I agree. Might have been= a > local thing then. As I remember it only the Athlon and then Semperon's we= re > 754. The 64's and FX's were 939. The later Athlons were AM2, but that was > just after I got this one, and they're the X2's I believe. But again, tha= t > may have been local. I think you're thinking of Socket 462. This might clear it up a little: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Athlon64 Chris