From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Feb 19 00:35:27 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF74316A4CE
	for <freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org>; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 00:35:27 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.193])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91D4943D46
	for <freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org>; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 00:35:27 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from zombyfork@gmail.com)
Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id f1so12913rne
        for <freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org>; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 16:35:27 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
	s=beta; d=gmail.com;
	h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references;
	b=alGa41fY155SfDNhX1OCFZig4pDLKHP40wzb1qmepzQh7xBFhrSPBQOSNyS4vP42u5CC3A4TdX9NtR6o0XiESBn/2ER4+U9QCirYkIBruyPoJwcn6a5P4RRZoLpNpCPeymmT9XDfBU/N7JLXTqQFibY7J/cvWx8/jN78KfTmQl8=
Received: by 10.38.68.14 with SMTP id q14mr99999rna;
        Fri, 18 Feb 2005 16:35:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.38.22.22 with HTTP; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 16:35:26 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <346a802205021816354ebbd91e@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 19:35:26 -0500
From: Coleman Kane <zombyfork@gmail.com>
To: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <20050218.131311.104079154.imp@bsdimp.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <20050218.102310.74705720.imp@bsdimp.com>
	 <200502181249.53139.jkim@niksun.com>
	 <346a8022050218113126c1af5f@mail.gmail.com>
	 <20050218.131311.104079154.imp@bsdimp.com>
cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: PC Card subpart to R3000 thread
X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: cokane@cokane.org
List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform <freebsd-amd64.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-amd64>,
	<mailto:freebsd-amd64-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-amd64>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-amd64-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-amd64>,
	<mailto:freebsd-amd64-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 00:35:28 -0000

On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 13:13:11 -0700 (MST), Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> wrote:
> 
> There are a number of issues relating to it, which makes it hard to
> solve generically (well, one could always write 255 as the subbus
> number, but that has some rather severe performance implications...
> 
> Warner
> 

How do we keep track of the busses now? What considerations must be
taken into account regarding setting the numbering this subordinate
bus number? In the patch code it seems that it is setting this
register to the same value as the bus number (10). You are stating
that it can be set to any number (PCIR_SUBBUS_1 that is)?

--
coleman