From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sat Mar 22 15:37:53 2003
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A35CE37B401
	for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Sat, 22 Mar 2003 15:37:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rwcrmhc53.attbi.com (rwcrmhc53.attbi.com [204.127.198.39])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16F0643F75
	for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Sat, 22 Mar 2003 15:37:52 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from fearow@attbi.com)
Received: from god.woofcat.com (12-251-110-17.client.attbi.com[12.251.110.17])
          by rwcrmhc53.attbi.com (rwcrmhc53) with SMTP
          id <20030322233751053005jjlme>; Sat, 22 Mar 2003 23:37:51 +0000
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2003 17:37:25 -0600
From: Anti <fearow@attbi.com>
To: Daniela <dgw@liwest.at>
Cc: kris@obsecurity.org, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Lots of kernel core dumps
Message-Id: <20030322173725.595dc772.fearow@attbi.com>
In-Reply-To: <200303230010.38736.dgw@liwest.at>
References: <200303212037.46322.dgw@liwest.at>
	<200303212226.01853.dgw@liwest.at>
	<20030321221514.GA24787@rot13.obsecurity.org>
	<200303230010.38736.dgw@liwest.at>
Organization: Woofcat
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.10 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.0)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-hackers.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-hackers>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-hackers>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Sun, 23 Mar 2003 00:10:38 +0100
Daniela <dgw@liwest.at> wrote:

> > I know, but 5.0-RELEASE was
> >
> > a) A work-in-progress, not a perfect, bug-free release
> >
> > b) A snapshot of 5.0-CURRENT
> >
> > You read the 5.0 Early Adopter's Guide, right?  Bugs like this are
> > expected at this stage in the development process, and if you
> > encounter them then you need to either give up on 5.x and go back to
> > 4.x-STABLE, or upgrade to 5.0-CURRENT if they are already fixed there.
> >
> > Kris
> 
> Yes, I read the Early Adopter's Guide.
> Is there any way to solve this without upgrading to -current?
> I want a stable server, of course, but I still want to help the FreeBSD folks 
> to make 5.0 the best release ever. This requires testing to be done.
> 
> Daniela


current isn't really any less stable than 5.0 release, likely more stable...


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message