From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org  Sat Aug 22 09:08:05 2020
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
 by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A76E3B350B;
 Sat, 22 Aug 2020 09:08:05 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from greg@unrelenting.technology)
Received: from out1.migadu.com (out1.migadu.com [IPv6:2001:41d0:2:863f::])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BYXbl5Kphz4MZK;
 Sat, 22 Aug 2020 09:08:03 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from greg@unrelenting.technology)
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2020 09:07:55 +0000
X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and
 include these headers.
From: myfreeweb <greg@unrelenting.technology>
To: Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com>,
 FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>,
 FreeBSD Toolchain <freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org>
CC: freebsd-arm <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: /usr/lib/libomp.so : is there a reason that aarch64 does not have
 such by default?
In-Reply-To: <2E4E8340-E4C1-4ED4-9E3D-F249D85D10FF@yahoo.com>
References: <2E4E8340-E4C1-4ED4-9E3D-F249D85D10FF.ref@yahoo.com>
 <2E4E8340-E4C1-4ED4-9E3D-F249D85D10FF@yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <90091F80-717F-4405-952B-B6B955AE6E1F@unrelenting.technology>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: 0.90
X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BYXbl5Kphz4MZK
X-Spamd-Bar: /
X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.48 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[];
 R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[unrelenting.technology:s=default];
 FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4];
 R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2001:41d0:2:863f::];
 MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[];
 TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[unrelenting.technology:+];
 DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[unrelenting.technology,none];
 NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.48)[-0.480];
 FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[yahoo.com,freebsd.org];
 RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[];
 MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[];
 ASN(0.00)[asn:16276, ipnet:2001:41d0::/32, country:FR];
 MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[];
 MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-arm,freebsd-current,freebsd-toolchain]
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
 <freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-current>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2020 09:08:05 -0000



On August 21, 2020 6:52:23 PM UTC, Mark Millard via freebsd-arm <freebsd-a=
rm@freebsd=2Eorg> wrote:
>My context: head ( currently at -r363590 )
>
>man src=2Econf is explicit that WITHOUT_OPENMP is the default for
>aarch64 (for example)=2E
[=2E=2E=2E]
>Nothing stands out for why WITH_OPENMP is in use by default only
>for amd64, i386, and powerpc64=2E

Because nobody has bothered to merge https://reviews=2Efreebsd=2Eorg/D2116=
7