From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Dec 17 03:35:43 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id DAA02254
          for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 17 Dec 1997 03:35:43 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers)
Received: from papagaio.voga.com.br (papagaio.voga.com.br [200.239.39.2])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id DAA02249
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 17 Dec 1997 03:35:35 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from daniel_sobral@voga.com.br)
From: daniel_sobral@voga.com.br
Received: by papagaio.voga.com.br(Lotus SMTP MTA v1.06 (346.7 3-18-1997))  id 03256570.003FAE48 ; Wed, 17 Dec 1997 08:35:33 -0300
X-Lotus-FromDomain: VOGA
To: avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au
cc: tlambert@primenet.com, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Message-ID: <83256570.003F9B60.00@papagaio.voga.com.br>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 1997 08:35:32 -0300
Subject: Re: Why so many steps to build new kernel?
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk


> How about the KISS approach ?  Or has that fallen out of favour ?

It did...