From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Mon Jun 22 15:14:30 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9894234F4C7 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 15:14:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from hz.grosbein.net (hz.grosbein.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:c2c:26d8::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "hz.grosbein.net", Issuer "hz.grosbein.net" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49rCck04wPz3TLT for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 15:14:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from eg.sd.rdtc.ru (eg.sd.rdtc.ru [IPv6:2a03:3100:c:13:0:0:0:5]) by hz.grosbein.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 05MFEPtk012198 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 22 Jun 2020 15:14:26 GMT (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) X-Envelope-From: eugen@grosbein.net X-Envelope-To: abrancatelli@schema31.it Received: from [10.58.0.10] (dadvw [10.58.0.10]) by eg.sd.rdtc.ru (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 05MFEMYl032108 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Mon, 22 Jun 2020 22:14:22 +0700 (+07) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Subject: Re: Problem with Sendmail Mailertable To: Andrea Brancatelli , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: From: Eugene Grosbein Message-ID: Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 22:14:15 +0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,LOCAL_FROM, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Report: * -2.3 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record * -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record * 2.6 LOCAL_FROM From my domains X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on hz.grosbein.net X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49rCck04wPz3TLT X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=permerror (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of eugen@grosbein.net uses mechanism not recognized by this client) smtp.mailfrom=eugen@grosbein.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.52 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.90)[-0.901]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.85)[-0.850]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[grosbein.net]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_PERMFAIL(0.00)[empty SPF record]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.67)[-0.671]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:2a01:4f8::/29, country:DE]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 15:14:30 -0000 22.06.2020 21:56, Andrea Brancatelli via freebsd-stable wrote: > I have an old 10.3 machine with sendmail 8.15.2 that's been working ok > for a long time. > > We have a simple mailterable rule that looks like: > > schema31.it dbmail-lmtpd[10.33.whatever] > > That we use to forward mail in LMTP from sendmail to another machine > where dbmail is working. Everything works as supposed but today after > years of service someone realized the syntax user+mailbox@schema31.it > doesn't work as expected. > > I did a bit of research and debugging and whatever and found out that > when a "+" is involved in the mail address mailertable's lookups doesn't > seem to work and the mail gets sent to local mailer. > > I tried even something fancy like > > .schema31.it dbmail-lmtpd[10.33.whatever] > > Or even the plain all catchall > > . dbmail-lmtpd[10.33.whatever] > > But nothing works. > > Anybody ever stepped on this and got it working? > > Please, please, please, avoid the "drop sendmail and switch to > " replies, if I could I would already done it ;-) This feature works for me but I use FEATURE(virtusertable) instead of mailertable to pass mail to my custom mailer: #virtusertable # the following rule diverts mail to "plussed" (and only plussed) destination addresses to custom mailer ++@realdomain.net %1%3@realdomain.net.pseudodomain #EOF (mailer definition has CPpseudodomain for this to work). Maybe it works for mailertable too, try it.