Date: Sun, 12 May 2002 08:44:50 -0700 (PDT) From: Greg Shenaut <greg@bogslab.ucdavis.edu> To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: ports/37995: lilypond port will not build due to bison/make-rule interaction Message-ID: <200205121544.g4CFioN65973@horsetail.bogs.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Number: 37995
>Category: ports
>Synopsis: lilypond port will not build due to bison/make-rule interaction
>Confidential: no
>Severity: serious
>Priority: medium
>Responsible: freebsd-ports
>State: open
>Quarter:
>Keywords:
>Date-Required:
>Class: sw-bug
>Submitter-Id: current-users
>Arrival-Date: Sun May 12 08:50:01 PDT 2002
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator: Greg Shenaut
>Release: FreeBSD 4.5-RELEASE i386
>Organization:
>Environment:
System: FreeBSD horsetail.bogs.org 4.5-RELEASE FreeBSD 4.5-RELEASE #2: Fri Mar 1 16:14:02 PST 2002 root@horsetail.bogs.org:/usr/src/sys/compile/HORSETAIL i386
>Description:
I'm trying to build the lilypond port and it's failing when make trys
to rename the output of bison. It looks like the problem is with
the rules in stepmake/stepmake for "bison -d"--the rules assume the
wrong filenames (the correct names seem to be "parser.tab.{cc,c,hh,h}"
but I may not have figured it out correctly. (As far as I can
tell, the bison manual page doesn't give the correct filenames
either.)
>How-To-Repeat:
cd /usr/ports/print/lilypond ; make
>Fix:
I think that all will work correctly if the rules for bison are fixed
in the stepmake/stepmake directory--I didn't notice any other problems.
However, I haven't been able to make it work yet.
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:
non-critical
medium
sw-bug
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200205121544.g4CFioN65973>