From owner-freebsd-current  Thu Sep  5 19:34:00 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id TAA07148
          for current-outgoing; Thu, 5 Sep 1996 19:34:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from parkplace.cet.co.jp (parkplace.cet.co.jp [202.32.64.1])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id TAA07129
          for <current@FreeBSD.org>; Thu, 5 Sep 1996 19:33:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (michaelh@localhost) by parkplace.cet.co.jp (8.7.5/CET-v2.1) with SMTP id CAA25593; Fri, 6 Sep 1996 02:30:26 GMT
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 1996 11:30:25 +0900 (JST)
From: Michael Hancock <michaelh@cet.co.jp>
Reply-To: Michael Hancock <michaelh@cet.co.jp>
To: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
cc: Paul Richards <p.richards@elsevier.co.uk>, rkw@dataplex.net,
        current@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Latest Current build failure
In-Reply-To: <199609052057.NAA09868@phaeton.artisoft.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SV4.3.93.960906102955.24754D-100000@parkplace.cet.co.jp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, 5 Sep 1996, Terry Lambert wrote:

> The old saw: how do you sanely implement revoloution?  The US has a
> complete governmental overthrow every 4-8 years, and does so without
> blood running in the streets.  All we are discussing here is a change
> in the rules of order -- we don't even want an overthrow.

Does revolution mean the government must sign a contract accepting
responsibility for all potential damage for an unspecified period of time?