From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue May 27 11:15:46 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D130CE8
 for <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>; Tue, 27 May 2014 11:15:46 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ob0-x22d.google.com (mail-ob0-x22d.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22d])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48A222CBC
 for <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>; Tue, 27 May 2014 11:15:46 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ob0-f173.google.com with SMTP id wm4so9075265obc.4
 for <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>; Tue, 27 May 2014 04:15:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
 :cc:content-type;
 bh=v53Ai5gJ1cf6+pv7Vpgab6pgBgq31YISc2K4tvyZrxE=;
 b=RERaC1FgC/i6EesyKC7HTLgPFg67Np1dt1QPKhEs1D0xphbVfkOdZ75+PyM9Hj/pl/
 oo4PhkrHOHipQnfeS2nvUP9KmHGCTAm9zrBKZdUpjPvykW84CL6E6QMz3jTZMlh8yrDC
 1AdtdkMNuAw7jHwZCx/5fvK8yn0wvJpSiqXEt5mg2hBmz6WFmJOfVYAfZ205b9KVt/Fe
 pw1nDj1nmBbOhGru/Gw+b7jb7vCH2NhsY/MOPX5fh1q7pSN03Swj6Vnk8f5X7KfQmtAp
 ILBHxnuP5W8z03HrvIhY5E5Wg4JtUAlLxzlbGB+jo7rcx9eAKeWzAmuSq3sHblMzJtKV
 T9cg==
X-Received: by 10.182.229.34 with SMTP id sn2mr32190959obc.6.1401189345581;
 Tue, 27 May 2014 04:15:45 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.76.123.178 with HTTP; Tue, 27 May 2014 04:15:15 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20130926034416.c2977781.mail@ulrich-grey.de>
References: <201309251442.r8PEgq5J013369@m5p.com>
 <20130925233822.563e344b.usenet@ulrich-grey.de>
 <20130926034416.c2977781.mail@ulrich-grey.de>
From: Jia-Shiun Li <jiashiun@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 19:15:15 +0800
Message-ID: <CAHNYxxOrRnytS+_dQv2XgjpD=_qMC9E0Z+A__Mi0hfGB9awN8g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Raspberry Pi crashes in random()
To: Ulrich Grey <mail@ulrich-grey.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: "freebsd-arm@freebsd.org" <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." <freebsd-arm.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-arm>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arm/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 11:15:46 -0000

On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Ulrich Grey <mail@ulrich-grey.de> wrote:
> Here some additional infos:
>
> #16 bugdro...@chromium.org
>
> Commit: d2127269301823f547129ac486f4fa5f0d2e0d2a
>  Email: cwolfe@chromium.org
>
> fontconfig: Reduce optimization level
>

Hi all,

-O0 work for me on BBB for fontconfig. Is it ok to you to file a PR
for this? Previously it was worked around by depending on gcc [1], and
another PR attempt by patching fontconfig for clang [2]. IMO -O0 is
better for now because it does not require gcc or patching fontconfig.
Looks binutils patches exist too but i'd leave those to experts.


[1] http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/181372
[2] http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/183536



-Jia-Shiun