From owner-freebsd-smp Sun Sep 19 18:24:55 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Received: from overcee.netplex.com.au (overcee.netplex.com.au [202.12.86.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78C8514BB8; Sun, 19 Sep 1999 18:24:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from peter@netplex.com.au) Received: from netplex.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by overcee.netplex.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1C1B1CC5; Mon, 20 Sep 1999 09:24:47 +0800 (WST) (envelope-from peter@netplex.com.au) X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: Poul-Henning Kamp Cc: smp@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Testers please! In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 19 Sep 1999 22:01:52 +0200." <17979.937771312@critter.freebsd.dk> Date: Mon, 20 Sep 1999 09:24:47 +0800 From: Peter Wemm Message-Id: <19990920012447.C1C1B1CC5@overcee.netplex.com.au> Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > If you have a PIIX4 based SMP system and run current, could you > please try out this patch: > > http://phk.freebsd.dk/piix/ > > I'm very interested in hearing if there are any measurable difference > apart from clock granularity being 3 times better. There is a problem with it as it tries to claim the same device as claimed by pcisupport.c and intpm.c.. pcisupport.c is where some folks have been hanging Tor Egge's RTC SMI trap patch from.. Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com; peter@netplex.com.au To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message