From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Dec 20 13:44:07 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60E12A29
 for <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>; Sat, 20 Dec 2014 13:44:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from woozle.rinet.ru (woozle.rinet.ru [195.54.192.68])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5BBB274B
 for <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>; Sat, 20 Dec 2014 13:44:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by woozle.rinet.ru (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id sBKAvx0i017618;
 Sat, 20 Dec 2014 13:57:59 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru)
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2014 13:57:59 +0300 (MSK)
From: Dmitry Morozovsky <marck@rinet.ru>
To: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Lo=EFc_BLOT?= <loic.blot@unix-experience.fr>
Subject: Re: High Kernel Load with nfsv4
In-Reply-To: <1419070695.4549.6.camel@unix-experience.fr>
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1412201355250.6852@woozle.rinet.ru>
References: <766911003.8048587.1418095910736.JavaMail.root@uoguelph.ca>
 <1e19554bc0d4eb3e8dab74e2056b5ec4@mail.unix-experience.fr>
 <alpine.BSF.2.00.1412192005130.6852@woozle.rinet.ru>
 <1419070695.4549.6.camel@unix-experience.fr>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23)
X-NCC-RegID: ru.rinet
X-OpenPGP-Key-ID: 6B691B03
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3
 (woozle.rinet.ru [0.0.0.0]); Sat, 20 Dec 2014 13:58:14 +0300 (MSK)
Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Filesystems <freebsd-fs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-fs>,
 <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
 <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2014 13:44:07 -0000

On Sat, 20 Dec 2014, Lo?c BLOT wrote:

> Hi Dmitry,
> you mean less process improve performance ?

I suppose yes, especially if you have small number of concurrently-accessing 
yout NFS server clients and/or client processes.

Default of 4, of course, is ridiculously low nowadays; however, I'll start 
with, say, 4 per CPU core you have, as someone mentioned previously.

-- 
Sincerely,
D.Marck                                     [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN]
[ FreeBSD committer:                                 marck@FreeBSD.org ]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru ***
------------------------------------------------------------------------