From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 16 08:22:04 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42D191065673; Sun, 16 Sep 2012 08:22:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from simon@FreeBSD.org) Received: from emx.nitro.dk (emx.nitro.dk [IPv6:2a01:4f8:120:7384::102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F09098FC08; Sun, 16 Sep 2012 08:22:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailscan.leto.nitro.dk (mailscan.leto.nitro.dk [127.0.1.4]) by emx.nitro.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 312AC2D5D35; Sun, 16 Sep 2012 08:22:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from emx.nitro.dk ([127.0.1.2]) by mailscan.leto.nitro.dk (mailscan.leto.nitro.dk [127.0.1.4]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 2nBd51giYV-G; Sun, 16 Sep 2012 08:22:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.4.24] (unknown [89.100.2.68]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by emx.nitro.dk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7486A2D5D30; Sun, 16 Sep 2012 08:22:00 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.0 \(1486\)) From: "Simon L. B. Nielsen" In-Reply-To: <20120916081747.GB27859@lonesome.com> Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2012 09:22:00 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <0BEDD396-A379-4F8E-A1FD-355154041650@FreeBSD.org> References: <505445FB.9020102@FreeBSD.org> <20120916081747.GB27859@lonesome.com> To: Mark Linimon X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1486) Cc: FBSD Doc project , Gabor Kovesdan , www@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RFC: future directions of the documentation after the XML migration X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2012 08:22:04 -0000 On 16 Sep 2012, at 09:17, Mark Linimon wrote: > I'm ambivalent about whether they should be deleted or archived intto > some "historic/" subdirectory, but they don't need to be things that > first-time users encounter. At least for web pages, moving them makes them less useful as we break = links. But I agree that all historic documents should be made clearly historic = so new users don't get confused by them. --=20 Simon L. B. Nielsen