From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 09:29:24 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 420DC16A400 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 09:29:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5A7F13C465 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 09:29:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (banyan.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.5]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.1/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l5C9TIcb007715 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:29:18 +0700 (ICT) Received: (from on@localhost) by banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.3/8.12.11) id l5C9TImI088357; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:29:18 +0700 (ICT) Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:29:18 +0700 (ICT) Message-Id: <200706120929.l5C9TImI088357@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> From: Olivier Nicole To: reko.turja@liukuma.net In-reply-to: <004201c7acd0$3465f2a0$0a0aa8c0@rivendell> (reko.turja@liukuma.net) References: <11046174.post@talk.nabble.com> <466C2D0F.3040708@webanoide.org><11050907.post@talk.nabble.com> <466C5069.1000903@vindaloo.com><11051531.post@talk.nabble.com> <20070612163811.75d813d5@localhost> <004201c7acd0$3465f2a0$0a0aa8c0@rivendell> X-Virus-Scanned: on CSIM by amavisd-milter (http://www.amavis.org/) Cc: peter@placidpublishing.net, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Spamassassin RBL's X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 09:29:24 -0000 > The directive above tells postfix to add information into > headers that tell Amavis the mail was sent by someone who was > authenticated by the system and thus trusted. I expect that the above mentionned headers cannot be forged. Else that would be a nice way for spam to avoid filtering. Beside, I am not sure it is a good measure to disable Amavis for any email. First goal of amavis is virus scanning, even a trusted/authenticated sender could have his machine infected and could be spreading viruses. My 2 cents. Olivier