Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 17:08:13 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: python@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 193316] [NEW PORT]: www/py-djblets06: Legacy version of py-djblets Message-ID: <bug-193316-21822-RDvKSklz0A@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-193316-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-193316-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193316 --- Comment #31 from John Marino <marino@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to chris.dukes.aix from comment #29) > And to repeat my earlier statement. > You need Djblets. > You do not need Djblets packaged for FreeBSD. If djblets-06 is needed for seahub in FreeBSD (which can't be committed until this is sorted) it has to be ports in FreeBSD. The exception is if seahub adds djblets-06 as one if its distfiles and builds it in the workdir at the same time as seahub. Maybe this is what you mean by "virtualenv", but this virtualenv has to work within ports without using the network during the build phase. > If not... your back to learning about packaging dependencies and best practices for an app framework... or hiring someone to do the work. Not me. I just commit ports to the tree when its ready. I just wanted python@ to say the *legacy* port should or should not be in the tree. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-193316-21822-RDvKSklz0A>