From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Jul 4 02:39:35 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C45769953F3 for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2015 02:39:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from quartz@sneakertech.com) Received: from douhisi.pair.com (douhisi.pair.com [209.68.5.179]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A54511CCD for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2015 02:39:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from quartz@sneakertech.com) Received: from [10.2.2.1] (pool-173-48-121-235.bstnma.fios.verizon.net [173.48.121.235]) by douhisi.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8D1BD3F707 for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 22:39:27 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <5597475F.2010301@sneakertech.com> Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2015 22:39:27 -0400 From: Quartz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD questions Subject: Re: slightly off topic: SMART error values for seagate drives References: <5595EE90.5050105@sneakertech.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2015 02:39:35 -0000 Just out of curiosity, does anyone think it's worth using this to stress-test ZFS at all? I'm wondering what would happen if I made this into a single drive pool and set copies=5 or something. (Obviously not with critical data though).