From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 5 22:51:19 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99B3916A433 for ; Wed, 5 Apr 2006 22:51:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from LoN_Kamikaze@gmx.de) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 95A0543D45 for ; Wed, 5 Apr 2006 22:51:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from LoN_Kamikaze@gmx.de) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 05 Apr 2006 22:51:17 -0000 Received: from p54A7E496.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO [192.168.0.12]) [84.167.228.150] by mail.gmx.net (mp001) with SMTP; 06 Apr 2006 00:51:17 +0200 X-Authenticated: #5465401 Message-ID: <443449E1.7000406@gmx.de> Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2006 00:51:13 +0200 From: "[LoN]Kamikaze" Organization: Lords of Nightmare User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060330) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeff Cross References: <4434286A.1010209@averageadmins.com> <44342E44.5050108@gmx.de> <4434382A.6090905@averageadmins.com> In-Reply-To: <4434382A.6090905@averageadmins.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: ports@freebsd.org, questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Using javavmwrapper X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2006 22:51:19 -0000 Jeff Cross wrote: > > Here is the reason I am asking, and maybe someone could shed some light > on this as well. > > I have been using Zend Studio Client 4.0.2 on FreeBSD 6.0-SECURITY for > quite some time. I updated my ports and packages (which Zend is not) > the other day and it hasn't worked since. > > So, if I wanted to try running Zend with the jdk15 port, how would I > specify that I wanted to use the 1.5 version of the jdk before firing > off the process? I wouldn't think that making the change in my > make.conf file would do this, would it? > It would.