From owner-freebsd-current Thu May 7 12:11:59 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA13436 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Thu, 7 May 1998 12:11:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from echonyc.com (echonyc.com [198.67.15.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA13320 for ; Thu, 7 May 1998 12:11:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from benedict@echonyc.com) Received: from localhost (benedict@localhost) by echonyc.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id PAA20018; Thu, 7 May 1998 15:11:02 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 7 May 1998 15:11:01 -0400 (EDT) From: Snob Art Genre To: Christopher Arnold cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Intel Etherexpress PRO/100+ PCI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 7 May 1998, Christopher Arnold wrote: > how is it with support for Intel Etherexpress PRO/100+ PCI, in the current > kernel? How is it with 2.2 kernels? Excellent and excellent, respectively. As I understand it, the PRO/100+ is just a PRO/100B, but fabricated differently -- they figured out how to do it with one less chip. But the interface is the same. I believe ftp.cdrom.com uses the PRO/100Bs. > Shouldn't there really be an entry in the FAQ explaining support for > diffrent intel ethernet cards? Probably -- are you volunteering to write it? Ben "You have your mind on computers, it seems." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message