From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 21 23:23:38 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53633106564A for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 23:23:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports@m.gmane.org) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F9268FC0A for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 23:23:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1T3xnG-00014a-2B for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Wed, 22 Aug 2012 01:23:30 +0200 Received: from 187.64.223.198 ([187.64.223.198]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2012 01:23:30 +0200 Received: from rakuco by 187.64.223.198 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2012 01:23:30 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: Raphael Kubo da Costa Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 20:23:19 -0300 Lines: 18 Message-ID: <87y5l74yoo.fsf@FreeBSD.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 187.64.223.198 User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.1 (berkeley-unix) Cancel-Lock: sha1:fsRI9o7Go53LbItco3LLvNAfT/o= Subject: Re: raptor: should there be a note in UPDATING? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 23:23:38 -0000 Robert Backhaus writes: > I just had a problem building liblrdf. The cause was raptor-1 was > still installed. Checking UPDATING shows nothing that mentions raptor > after the KDE update last November. > Does there need to a note in UPDATING to uninstall raptor? It seems more appropriate to fix the port: according to the build log posted in <201208211544.18566.lumiwa@gmail.com> (the other liblrdf thread), -I/usr/local/include is being passed before -I/usr/local/include/raptor2, and it is likely that the source code #includes , which is installed by both raptor and raptor2 (albeit into different directories). Someone (TM) should check whether the first include is really necessary, or if the code can't include , or if -I/usr/local/include/raptor2 can't be passed before -I/usr/local/include.