From owner-freebsd-pkg@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 1 07:24:27 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3E75434 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 07:24:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-vn0-x232.google.com (mail-vn0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c0f::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9FF7AE1D for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 07:24:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vn0-f50.google.com with SMTP id g129so101698vnb.9 for ; Wed, 01 Apr 2015 00:24:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=9/SllQRvkwOi3pKuAZ2aDyWhhZr0h22BmZ12g4PP+1g=; b=yKvu1eixqjlUQwF+BxR2HyxB8r1tZ6Qs0WxkGvAtGsHqCZ9WYAA+F8WhFsCX+c6xF0 gHvBkhiqiZlDkMT46CXcF1AtzrexWilYafUdXM5Ec8kkZ5GnpsIGhHOjEQRrOITxF3mx WmwNWzKhKvwiz2OWY8ds89uXCwK1W+qfmAPBhDYvqKdYYFg3RAfjTH58ZhzAxToUzTJW mddL1D/MkCMS6+75UBaaVSMuWncqfhq5otlSx8hoQ0n0ZxgqPlLP4hnFlm70bZb1BHK6 1OQKMP44a+nApu8VIyJXs/4HYdWHMWQX3svGpQNJ1PLRxJ+8wHf8k6rJvFxUrXlM8g+Y Xt8g== X-Received: by 10.52.92.100 with SMTP id cl4mr41711896vdb.94.1427873065675; Wed, 01 Apr 2015 00:24:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ivaldir.etoilebsd.net ([2001:41d0:8:db4c::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id k10sm182446vdi.18.2015.04.01.00.24.23 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 01 Apr 2015 00:24:24 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Baptiste Daroussin Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2015 09:24:20 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: sg-ball@laposte.net Subject: Re: Problem with pkg behind a chunking proxy Message-ID: <20150401072420.GN30115@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <902242756.31277524.1427836544530.JavaMail.zimbra@laposte.net> <1476070491.31317997.1427838521190.JavaMail.zimbra@laposte.net> <20150331223320.GJ30115@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <2106067877.31883344.1427872133869.JavaMail.zimbra@laposte.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="xdWF/UuCWMRSqXrg" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2106067877.31883344.1427872133869.JavaMail.zimbra@laposte.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Binary package management and package tools discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 07:24:27 -0000 --xdWF/UuCWMRSqXrg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 09:08:53AM +0200, sg-ball@laposte.net wrote: > I could join to GitHub, fork pkg and commit the patch to my fork (https:/= /github.com/sg-ball/pkg), but it is still untested and I wonder if the disp= lay "file: 0%" that directly goes to 100% is acceptable. >=20 > Anyway, thanks for you quick anwser The progress is ok for now, we would need to fix that but let's do that is a second patch after that one is validated and in. Best regards, Bapt --xdWF/UuCWMRSqXrg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlUbnSQACgkQ8kTtMUmk6Ez6jQCeLHBtXpIbbtSZ1jXTkcDQ3hQ4 ZoAAn1+9PuTDLDAdBqDH9YqPZ1fS30La =Df9D -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --xdWF/UuCWMRSqXrg--