From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Apr 10 00:35:27 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id AAA21751 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 10 Apr 1997 00:35:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from caipfs.rutgers.edu (root@caipfs.rutgers.edu [128.6.19.100]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id AAA21726; Thu, 10 Apr 1997 00:35:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jenolan.caipgeneral (jenolan.rutgers.edu [128.6.111.5]) by caipfs.rutgers.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id DAA16159; Thu, 10 Apr 1997 03:35:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: by jenolan.caipgeneral (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id DAA00307; Thu, 10 Apr 1997 03:34:02 -0400 Date: Thu, 10 Apr 1997 03:34:02 -0400 Message-Id: <199704100734.DAA00307@jenolan.caipgeneral> From: "David S. Miller" To: grog@lemis.de CC: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, chat@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: <199704100623.PAA01255@papillon.lemis.de> (grog@lemis.de) Subject: Re: Informix efficiency--any ideas? Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Seems like B is an SGI/IRIX box, if so the results do no surprise me one bit.... Correct me if I am wrong ;-) ---------------------------------------------//// Yow! 11.26 MB/s remote host TCP bandwidth & //// 199 usec remote TCP latency over 100Mb/s //// ethernet. Beat that! //// -----------------------------------------////__________ o David S. Miller, davem@caip.rutgers.edu /_____________/ / // /_/ ><