From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Dec 26 06:57:16 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id GAA05028 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Sat, 26 Dec 1998 06:57:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from shell6.ba.best.com (shell6.ba.best.com [206.184.139.137]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id GAA05021 for ; Sat, 26 Dec 1998 06:57:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkb@shell6.ba.best.com) Received: (from jkb@localhost) by shell6.ba.best.com (8.9.1/8.9.0/best.sh) id GAA15993 for hackers@freebsd.org; Sat, 26 Dec 1998 06:56:33 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <19981226065633.A14892@best.com> Date: Sat, 26 Dec 1998 06:56:33 -0800 From: "Jan B. Koum " To: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: IPv6 - when? which? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93.2i Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Not to beat around dead horse - but what was the final outcome of the "which IPv6 vendor" thread a few weeks back? Will 3.1-CURRENT get an IPsec and IPv6? To be very honest - I am more interested in IPsec then v6. -- Yan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message