Date: Wed, 01 Sep 1999 15:54:49 -0700 From: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au> To: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> Cc: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>, Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>, nate@mt.sri.com (Nate Williams), Mitsuru IWASAKI <iwasaki@jp.FreeBSD.org>, mmuir@es.co.nz, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: followup to apm problems. Message-ID: <199909012254.PAA01495@dingo.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 01 Sep 1999 16:52:11 MDT." <199909012252.QAA20666@harmony.village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> In message <199909012245.PAA01429@dingo.cdrom.com> Mike Smith writes: > : It's reasonable to assume this, yes. However it's also worth bearing > : in mind that since the BIOS isn't using these interrupts to _detect_ > : activity, turning them off is pretty pointless. > > Then why does the key up event cause the suspend to fail? Because whatever mechanism the BIOS _is_ using to detect keyboard activity is catching it. -- \\ The mind's the standard \\ Mike Smith \\ of the man. \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ -- Joseph Merrick \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199909012254.PAA01495>