From owner-freebsd-chat Tue Jan 9 0:51:22 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from citusc.usc.edu (citusc.usc.edu [128.125.38.123]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C7D137B404 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2001 00:51:05 -0800 (PST) Received: (from kris@localhost) by citusc.usc.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id AAA18281; Tue, 9 Jan 2001 00:52:20 -0800 Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2001 00:52:20 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Cc: chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Hard drive copy protection a myth? Message-ID: <20010109005220.A18239@citusc.usc.edu> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: ; from des@ofug.org on Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 11:16:47AM +0100 Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org --cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 11:16:47AM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > Excerpt from the latest RISKS digest: The Register dissected this and came to the conclusion that basically this was spin control after the fact, and that other evidence supported the intent of use in fixed media. Kris --cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE6WtFEWry0BWjoQKURAqRoAJ9SvLG4fEZwvonATZisugZMwG9lQwCeI7ki Cs4zz8XexDo9pNECTd4W+/s= =3AAq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message