From owner-freebsd-current  Wed May 20 05:27:35 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id FAA27930
          for freebsd-current-outgoing; Wed, 20 May 1998 05:27:35 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from labinfo.iet.unipi.it (labinfo.iet.unipi.it [131.114.9.5])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id FAA27914
          for <current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 20 May 1998 05:27:20 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it)
Received: from localhost (luigi@localhost) by labinfo.iet.unipi.it (8.6.5/8.6.5) id MAA11734; Wed, 20 May 1998 12:42:01 +0200
From: Luigi Rizzo <luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it>
Message-Id: <199805201042.MAA11734@labinfo.iet.unipi.it>
Subject: Re: and again on forwarding...
To: eivind@yes.no (Eivind Eklund)
Date: Wed, 20 May 1998 12:42:01 +0200 (MET DST)
Cc: wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu, current@FreeBSD.ORG
In-Reply-To: <19980520141228.03211@follo.net> from "Eivind Eklund" at May 20, 98 02:12:09 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> > It could be avoided by simply rewriting the IP input code to not munge
> > the IP header (and IP output to expect it to be munged).  Easy enough
> > to do, but it's a pain to find all the clients which expect it to be
> > munged.
> 
> Is that only clients in our kernel, or are there clients 'out there'
> which we'd have to care for, too?

i think he only refers to kernel 'clients'. Not a big deal, IMHO.

	cheers
	luigi

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message