From owner-freebsd-current Wed Apr 22 11:49:15 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA13927 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Wed, 22 Apr 1998 11:49:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [195.8.129.14]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA13893 for ; Wed, 22 Apr 1998 18:49:08 GMT (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.8.7/8.8.5) with ESMTP id UAA04384; Wed, 22 Apr 1998 20:48:24 +0200 (CEST) To: "Matthew N. Dodd" cc: Garrett Wollman , Harlan Stenn , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bin/6353 In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 22 Apr 1998 14:24:36 EDT." Date: Wed, 22 Apr 1998 20:48:24 +0200 Message-ID: <4382.893270904@critter.freebsd.dk> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message , "Matthew N. Dodd" writes: >On Wed, 22 Apr 1998, Garrett Wollman wrote: >> Strongly disagree. Every NFS system out there comes with an >> automounter of some sort or another. Most of them come with Sun's >> broken automount(8), for which the source is thankfully unavailable. >> amd is an important, fundamental part of an NFS implementation (and >> one which we may need to hack at times in order to reflect changes in >> our kernel code). > >It looks like am-utils and amd are the same thing, a few years removed >from eachother. I don't see what the problem is. The question is, should it be a port or should it be contrib ? I guess we should leave this to whoever submits either of these first :-) -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." "Drink MONO-tonic, it goes down but it will NEVER come back up!" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message