Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 14 May 1999 10:32:23 -0400 (EDT)
From:      Rob Garrett <eagle@phc.igs.net>
To:        "David E. Cross" <crossd@cs.rpi.edu>
Cc:        Chuck Youse <cyouse@cybersites.com>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: 1GB, kvm issues. 
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.10.9905141029490.31555-100000@eagle.phc.igs.net>
In-Reply-To: <199905141456.KAA23614@cs.rpi.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


On Fri, 14 May 1999, David E. Cross wrote:

> > It's been noted on several occasions that with large (> 256MB) of RAM, one
> > has to be "careful" with the configuration (NMBCLUSTERS, MAXUSERS) to
> > prevent the box from falling over every few days due to kvm problems.
> > 
> > Can somebody be more specific?  I'm just about to order a really, really
> > expensive machine and I want to be sure I can get it to work .. :) 
> > 
> > Chuck Youse 
> 
> This was fixed somewhere in the 3.1-STABLE branch, you will not need to worry
> about this at all with 3.2-BETA/3.2-RELEASE.
> 
I thought so as well, however I added a 64 meg dimm and ran into the same
problems he is describing. After I remembered the problem. I lowered the
value of maxusers and everything is back to normal. This is on 4.0 -
Current. btw..

1 - 128 meg dimm
1 - 64  meg dimm

and for the record

750 meg of swap space

rob



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.10.9905141029490.31555-100000>