From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Nov 25 11:12:37 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8229A37B40F for ; Mon, 25 Nov 2002 11:12:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from bast.unixathome.org (bast.unixathome.org [66.11.174.150]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80FC843E4A for ; Mon, 25 Nov 2002 11:12:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dan@langille.org) Received: from wocker (wocker.unixathome.org [192.168.0.99]) by bast.unixathome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 665FE3F4B; Mon, 25 Nov 2002 14:12:24 -0500 (EST) From: "Dan Langille" To: ports@FreeBSD.org Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 14:12:24 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: FreshPorts sanity testing - should errors be sent to committers? Cc: dan@langille.org Message-ID: <3DE22FC8.10368.D3893A69@localhost> In-reply-to: <20021124112140.J39895-100000@12-234-90-219.client.attbi.com> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v4.02a) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-description: Mail message body Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org So said DougB: > On Sun, 24 Nov 2002, Dan Langille wrote: > > > I wish to raise the issue of making this feature non-opt-in. > > Not only no, but hell no. A feature is available which improves quality, catches simple syntax errors immediately, and has zero affect on those who do their work error-free.. Why do you object to that? -- Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message