From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 31 14:02:10 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96E0516A41F for ; Mon, 31 Oct 2005 14:02:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from csaba@beastie.creo.hu) Received: from beastie.creo.hu (www.creo.hu [217.113.62.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41D7143D46 for ; Mon, 31 Oct 2005 14:02:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from csaba@beastie.creo.hu) Received: from beastie.creo.hu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by beastie.creo.hu (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j9VE0doG063539 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 31 Oct 2005 15:00:39 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from csaba@beastie.creo.hu) Received: (from csaba@localhost) by beastie.creo.hu (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j9VE0cIl063538; Mon, 31 Oct 2005 15:00:38 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from csaba) Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 15:00:38 +0100 From: Csaba Henk To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20051031140038.GH2911@beastie.creo.hu> References: <20051030134902.GG2911@beastie.creo.hu> <72cf361e0510300958w33bf3u3f754e68794b858d@mail.gmail.com> <43651D7B.6000005@computer.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43651D7B.6000005@computer.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: Eric Schuele Subject: Re: backup strategies X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 14:02:10 -0000 Thanks for all the tips and answers, I will consider the mentioned alternatives. Yet I have one more question... On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 01:22:35PM -0600, Eric Schuele wrote: > dump(8) will create a snapshot of a live filesystem, dump the snapshot > and then remove the snapshot, if given the correct flags ('-L'). Can even a full bakcup done safely on a live filesystem by "dump -L"? As dump(8) says when explaining the -L flag: To obtain a consistent dump image, dump takes a snapshot of the file system in the .snap directory in the root of the file system being dumped and then does a dump of the snapshot. I don't see how the temporary snapshot can improve the reliability/consistency/correctness of the dump. Could someone explain this? -- Csaba Henk My sense of humour is often too subtle to cope with getting smileyd. Please don't take it personal.