From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Mar 23 01:50:26 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8851A16A4CF
	for <freebsd-doc@hub.freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 23 Mar 2004 01:50:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 680ED43D1D
	for <freebsd-doc@hub.freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 23 Mar 2004 01:50:25 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	i2N9oPbv070391	for <freebsd-doc@freefall.freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 23 Mar 2004 01:50:25 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2N9oPBi070390;
	Tue, 23 Mar 2004 01:50:25 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from gnats)
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 01:50:25 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <200403230950.i2N9oPBi070390@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org
From: Colin Percival <colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: docs/64291: inet_ntoa static buffer - man page ammendment
X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Colin Percival <colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk>
List-Id: Documentation project <freebsd-doc.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc>,
	<mailto:freebsd-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-doc>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-doc@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc>,
	<mailto:freebsd-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 09:50:26 -0000

The following reply was made to PR docs/64291; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Colin Percival <colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk>
To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, lee@nerds.org.uk
Cc:  
Subject: Re: docs/64291: inet_ntoa static buffer - man page ammendment
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 09:47:10 +0000

   Under BUGS, inet_ntoa(3) says:
 "The string returned by inet_ntoa() resides in a static memory area."
 
   Is this insufficient?  If so, what should it say?
 
 Colin Percival