From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 4 07:44:13 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 227A916A4DD; Fri, 4 Aug 2006 07:44:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stefan@fafoe.narf.at) Received: from viefep14-int.chello.at (viefep13-int.chello.at [213.46.255.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DC3443D46; Fri, 4 Aug 2006 07:44:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stefan@fafoe.narf.at) Received: from wombat.fafoe.narf.at ([213.47.85.26]) by viefep14-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.6.01.05.04 201-2131-123-105-20051025) with ESMTP id <20060804074409.FBKK2199.viefep14-int.chello.at@wombat.fafoe.narf.at>; Fri, 4 Aug 2006 09:44:09 +0200 Received: by wombat.fafoe.narf.at (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 46C98BC7E; Fri, 4 Aug 2006 09:23:24 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 09:23:23 +0200 From: Stefan Farfeleder To: Yar Tikhiy Message-ID: <20060804072323.GC89735@wombat.fafoe.narf.at> References: <200608031905.k73J55D2061870@repoman.freebsd.org> <44D29FB6.9090209@freebsd.org> <20060804012514.GA63379@what-creek.com> <20060804071909.GS97316@comp.chem.msu.su> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060804071909.GS97316@comp.chem.msu.su> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, pdeuskar@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/em if_em.c if_em.h X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2006 07:44:13 -0000 On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 11:19:09AM +0400, Yar Tikhiy wrote: > > As a general remark, it is a very good idea to keep large style(9) > sweeps separate from actual code changes even if they are tiny. > Changing style(9) shouldn't alter the binary code produced, and > this can be 100% verified using cmp(1), diff(1), cksum(1), or md5(1). > Of course, changing line numbers will affect debug info, but the > latter can be strip(1)'ed. In the case under discussion, I'd compare > if_em.o with its former version to make sure no code changed. It will produce different code if __LINE__ is used. Stefan