From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Aug 6 16:25: 5 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from dfw-ix1.ix.netcom.com (dfw-ix1.ix.netcom.com [206.214.98.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEFA514C3B for ; Fri, 6 Aug 1999 16:25:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from asami@cs.berkeley.edu) Received: (from smap@localhost) by dfw-ix1.ix.netcom.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) id SAA29828; Fri, 6 Aug 1999 18:24:31 -0500 (CDT) Received: from sji-ca43-178.ix.netcom.com(209.111.209.178) by dfw-ix1.ix.netcom.com via smap (V1.3) id rma029800; Fri Aug 6 18:24:01 1999 Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (8.9.3/8.6.9) id QAA10843; Fri, 6 Aug 1999 16:23:21 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 6 Aug 1999 16:23:21 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199908062323.QAA10843@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> X-Authentication-Warning: silvia.hip.berkeley.edu: asami set sender to asami@cs.berkeley.edu using -f To: vanderh@ecf.utoronto.ca Cc: ports@freebsd.org In-reply-to: <19990806192008.F11290@mad> (message from Tim Vanderhoek on Fri, 6 Aug 1999 19:20:08 -0400) Subject: Re: linux_base From: asami@freebsd.org (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) References: <19990806192008.F11290@mad> Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org * From: Tim Vanderhoek * The linux_base has never worked for the -current package build sweep. * This isn't a problem and has been deemed acceptable. Until Satoshi * decides to split his (eight?) machines between running -current and * running -stable, such problems will probably always exist. I've thought about that, but I first need to design a way to selectively submit jobs to some subset of the build machines, or it will just turn this into a crapshoot. Satoshi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message